{"id":16676,"date":"2023-06-08T14:41:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-08T12:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.crfj.org\/?p=16676"},"modified":"2023-07-05T08:50:21","modified_gmt":"2023-07-05T06:50:21","slug":"call-for-paper-paleometallurgy-conservation-complementarity-or-antagonism-towards-conservation-2-0-for-metallic-objects-deadline-july-31st","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.crfj.org\/en\/call-for-paper-paleometallurgy-conservation-complementarity-or-antagonism-towards-conservation-2-0-for-metallic-objects-deadline-july-31st\/","title":{"rendered":"CALL FOR PAPER : \u00ab\u00a0Paleometallurgy \/ Conservation: Complementarity or Antagonism? Towards Conservation 2.0 for Metallic Objects\u00a0\u00bb (deadline July 31st)."},"content":{"rendered":"

Under the auspices <\/strong>of: <\/strong>Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS<\/strong>), the Centre de Recherche Fran\u00e7ais \u00e0 J\u00e9rusalem (<\/em>CRFJ<\/strong>) and the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA<\/strong>).<\/p>\n

With the participation of\u00a0:<\/strong> the Laboratoire Arch\u00e9om\u00e9trie et Pr\u00e9vention de l\u2019Alt\u00e9ration (LAPA-NIMBE-IRAMAT \u2013 Universit\u00e9 Paris-Saclay<\/strong>).<\/p>\n

With the support of :<\/strong> the Graduate School of Humanities \u2013 Heritage Science <\/em>Paris-Saclay.<\/p>\n

Organization\/contacts<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

Dr. Sylvain Bauvais, (CNRS<\/strong>, CRFJ<\/strong>) \u2013 sylvain.bauvais@cea.fr<\/a><\/p>\n

Dr. Robert Kool (IAA<\/strong>) \u2013 robert@israntique.org.il<\/a><\/p>\n

Participants<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

Open to professionals, scholars and students of Paleometallurgy\/Conservation sciences.<\/p>\n

Location<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

Day 1\u00a0: Israel Antiquities Authority National Campus of Archaeology<\/em> (IAA), Rupin St 11, Jerusalem.<\/p>\n

Day 2\u00a0: French Research Center in Jerusalem (<\/em>CRFJ), Shimshon St 3, Baaka, Jerusalem.<\/p>\n

Language<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

All lectures are in English<\/p>\n

Scientific <\/strong>Theme<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

Excavation poses a dilemma of destruction versus preservation. While it is crucial to bear in mind that excavation can be detrimental to archaeological sites, the primary goal of archaeology is the safeguarding of cultural heritage and its inherent data. This is especially relevant today, as over 90% of archaeological data in countries like France and Israel is derived from preventive archaeology.<\/p>\n

Archaeometric studies on metal artifacts from archaeological sites, encompassing technology, provenance, and dating, often necessitate intrusive or even destructive techniques. This is attributed to the heterogeneous nature of these materials and the limitations of non-invasive methods. Thus, they share similarities with the excavation process itself. Conversely, ensuring the long-term preservation of metals requires a comprehensive understanding of the materials involved and the processes of alteration. This knowledge is crucial for making informed decisions regarding conservation and restoration.<\/p>\n

Preserving the physical integrity of objects frequently presents a significant challenge to the advancement of paleometallurgical studies, particularly when the objects become part of museum or state collections, as is the case in France and Israel. The intricate relationship between archaeometric analysis and object conservation is particularly pertinent for iron and other metals prone to significant corrosion over time, both within and outside of their conservation environment. Once an object is unearthed, a real countdown begins, with the risk of complete destruction if no preventive interventions are applied. Implementing preventive measures is costly, involving methods, storage, and other resources, and it is not feasible to apply them to every discovered object, especially in countries where preventive archaeology yields a vast quantity of material. A contradiction arises between removing an object intrusively or destructively, and leaving it untouched. The former allows for the extraction of a maximum amount of archaeological information before it vanishes, while the latter preserves the object’s integrity but risks deterioration and the loss of its valuable information. This dilemma is particularly prominent in Israel, where, similar to France, preventive archaeology is highly developed, and archaeological objects possess significant national heritage value.<\/p>\n

In France, paleometallurgical studies have become possible through ongoing collaboration between archaeologists, archaeometry specialists, and conservators. This collaboration has successfully integrated archaeometry as a crucial component in the field of conservation. Notably, such interdisciplinary approaches are implemented within the University of Paris-Saclay and its Graduate School \u201cHistoire et Science du Patrimoine\u201d (HSP), in conjunction with research laboratories like the CNRS Laboratoire Arch\u00e9om\u00e9trie et Pr\u00e9vention de l\u2019Alt\u00e9ration (LAPA-NIMBE-IRAMAT) located in the French Commissariat for Atomic Energy (CEA-Saclay).<\/p>\n

To foster knowledge exchange and shared experiences, this workshop will facilitate a dialogue between Israeli and French archaeometry specialists, archaeologists, restorers, and conservators. Two French researchers, who specialize in paleo-metallurgy and new techniques of metal preservation, will contribute to the discussions. The primary objective of the workshop is to encourage reflection on individual practices and explore how these practices can be adapted and mutually enhance the work of participants.<\/p>\n

Organization:<\/strong><\/p>\n

This Workshop will be organized in partnership between LAPA-IRAMAT\/NIMBE, Paris-Saclay University, the French Research Center in Jerusalem (CRFJ) and the <\/strong>Israel<\/strong> Antiquities Authority (IAA)<\/strong> on October 23 and 24, 2023<\/u><\/strong>. It will be followed by 2 days of practical exchanges within paleo-metallurgical study laboratories and Israeli metal conservation centers.<\/p>\n

The Workshop will be hosted by the CRFJ, which will be responsible for welcoming the participants and the IAA, which will host the first day in the auditorium of its new building in Jerusalem. The communications will be accessible by videoconference for students, French and Israeli.<\/p>\n

Eight 20-minute presentations<\/strong> will be offered on the second day. We invite you to submit your abstracts as soon as possible (deadline July 31st) so that we can organize this second day of communication.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Program<\/strong> proposal<\/strong><\/p>\n

Day 1: 23\/10\/2023 – IAA <\/strong>Building<\/strong>, Jerusalem<\/strong><\/p>\n

9:00: Arrival\/welcome of participants, coffee<\/p>\n

9:45: Welcome speeches: Dr. Yuval Baruch, Head, IAA Archaeological Division<\/p>\n

10:00-11:00: Philippe Dillmann: \u2018Determining the corrosion processes on archaeological iron: from analogue studies to conservation issues\u2019.<\/p>\n

11:00-11:30: Break<\/p>\n

11:30-12:30: Delphine Neff: \u2018New approaches to the conservation and stabilization of metallic objects\u2019.<\/p>\n

12:30-13:00: Discussion<\/p>\n

13:00-14:30: Lunch<\/p>\n

14:30-15:00: Adi Eliyahu-Behar and Naama Yahalom-Mack: \u2018Preservation of Iron in Archaeological Sites of the Southern Levant: A View from the 1st<\/sup> Millennium BCE\u2019.<\/p>\n

15:00-15:30: Erez Ben-Yosef: \u2018Analyzing copper-based alloys: opting for destructive\u2019.<\/p>\n

15:30-16:00: Sylvain Bauvais: \u2018Setting up research into iron paleo-metallurgy in France and Israel\u2019.<\/p>\n

16:00-17:00: Discussion<\/p>\n

Lunch for organizers and guests<\/strong><\/p>\n

Day 2: 24\/10\/2023 – CRFJ, Jerusalem<\/strong><\/p>\n

9:00: Arrival\/welcome of participants, coffee<\/p>\n

9:45 am: Welcome speech by the Director of the CRFJ<\/p>\n

10:00-10:30: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

10:30-11:00: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

11:00-11:30: Break<\/p>\n

11:30-12:00: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

12:00-12:30: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

12:30-14:00: Lunch<\/p>\n

14:00-14:30: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

14:30-15:00: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

15:00-15:30: Break<\/p>\n

15:30-16:00: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n

16:00-16:30: 20 minutes talk and 10 minutes questions<\/p>\n